Відео

It has been 3 months since I uploaded this video. The game probably got some optimizations, they also added a toggle for Async Compute, if you disable this it boosts your FPS a bit on 40 series cards. Also, different maps performs quite differently, so for a fair comparison you must test on the same map as I played on.

It's right there, in the description. "Music: Witchouse 40k - BAYONETTA"

Without DLSS it would only run around 30-40FPS, frame-gen is basically useless at this low framerate.

@@yezivid dlss on graphic blur

Technically I don't think that it looks bad, but imo it's just sooo generic, soulless and unappealing. But hey, at least it also runs like crap lmao.

Well, then you are definitely not playing at native 1080p Ultra, cause even a 1080 Ti can only manage around 65FPS at High preset. ua-cam.com/video/bqLOybQnvzc/v-deo.htmlsi=1u0x3sbHXwCNawny

I think 50-60FPS in Cyberpunk is absolutely possible, even with like 4 cores/threads. A few months ago I did a few benchmarks with a 5800X3D at 4 cores/SMT Off, it was genuinely surprising how capable it still was even with that low core count: ua-cam.com/video/X5tM5ZBzY5w/v-deo.htmlsi=4RE_sXo6LFDz3DDu I did want to run a few benchmarks with my 7800X3D downcored to 4/6 cores, but I got rid of the CPU before I had the time to do it lol. Now I'll stick to the 7600X for at least a few months, so I'll definitely gonna upload some stuff with lower core counts (maybe even compare it to something like a 5600X). One thing I really wanted to test is how the L3 cache would scale with lower core counts, maybe the extra cache could help to somewhat eliminate the lack of cores - tho I' would need both a non-X3D and a X3D chip (or preferably a 7900/7950X3D) to make that happen.

@@yezivid I was thinking with PL and/or more busy areas it would be harder to run, IIRC I remember you needed like a 5600X3D or a 3700 (basically 8 core or very good 6 core lol) to get ~60fps

Nope there is. Depends on game, settings and fps targets.

@@45eno yes bro definitely. Because i got this cpu too and yes difference is depending for the games.

You will never see 50% difference on average, maybe not even 30% - in HUB’s day one review, they’ve measured a 16% difference between the 7800X3D and 7600X, while in the Intel 14th gen review, it was 28% on average. It really depends on the game, some games benefits hugely from the massive L3 cache while others doesn’t really care about it. I admit that I had some GPU bound scenes, tho it was mostly in just Returnal/Starfield, the other games were nearly always CPU bound. I realized in the end that I could have used lower settings, but I started testing with the 7600, since I only had this CPU for like 2 weeks, while my 7800X3D was under warranty-process. Talking about RT - I usually turn up CPU intensive graphics settings, and while RT puts a decent load on the GPU, it’s also pretty heavy on the CPU too - if I remember correctly, there was a much less difference in Cyberpunk without RT, but Marvel’s Spider Man’s RT is also really CPU intensive if you max out the object range slider. You can test CPU performance in a lot of ways, and I don’t think there is only one correct way to do - that’s just how I prefer to test.

rt effects cpu......

@@megadeth8592 but it still relies more on your GPU

Yes, as you can see on the in-game overlay too. CPU at 4.5GHz, GPU at 1455MHz.

that was it is only cpu limited which is point of the video.

Adding an 8" sub to a pair of 8" speakers is just stupid imo, obviously you would get more bass (tho the 2850DB can produce plenty of bass on it's own), but it wouldn't expand the frequency range, since the T8 can only go as low as ~38Hz. You'll need at least a 10" or 12" sub to get some worthy improvements in the low end.

Try disabling Async Compute in the graphics settings, tho it shouldn't cause that much of a difference.

@yezivid figured it out. Just goes to show how buggy this game still is. I was testing a 4k monitor a couple weeks back and I guess its when the issue started to happen when I switched back to my 1440p monitor. Even though I have it set at 1440p even re-installed the game didn't fix it. So I simply set it down to 1080p resolution and then back to 1440p and now it's showing around 110fps like how it supposed to.

Will do it tonight.

@@yezivid and pls test in conquest 64 players mod

@@l4zyyy.-482 There you go, bud. ua-cam.com/video/82q7x5hjXmk/v-deo.htmlsi=K_6mVdzksLsmac7G

@@yezivid thank you very much

Nothing fancy, CO -30 on all cores, Boost Override 200, and I think I also got PBO Enhancement at 90 Level 5. Getting an average of ~4964MHz effective clock speed while running Cinebench R24.

@@yezivid nice! Thank you for the info. Have a good day 😊

At 1440p Ultra, I'm getting around 130-140FPS. Also, I just realized that now they added a toggle for Async Compute. Now that with this turned off, the game runs even better, going from 90-100FPS to 100-110FPS at Ultrawide 1440p.

@@yezivid what is that new technology?

High room temp, low fan speed and no offset mount, guess these combined did the trick lol. Now that I got the offset mount, the 7800X3D maxes out at 82C under Cinebench R24.

@@yezivid l have thermalright phantom spirit Se 120 and it never reaches 80c in cinebench

@@canpehlivan2497 Thats weird. What is your average clock speed and package power while running Cinebench?

​@@canpehlivan2497I'm going yo buy it.. do u have any problems with it?

@@canpehlivan2497 temps can vary because of a WIDE range of things. Room temp, case airflow, fan/pump speed. A CPU will run hotter with a low quality AIO in a 30 degree room if the AIO is on low settings, then a great air cooler on MAX speed in the same room. Then there is always variance between regardless. Several degrees is probably weird if it was running the EXACT same set up, but barely anyone is.

Both clips was played in Chrome, using the sites own player. Cowboy Bebop (360p) was at a site called Indavideó, while Bleach Opening (480p) was on UA-cam.

You are the only one who knows the answer for that question. Do you need that kind of performance that the 7800X3D offers? From a price/performance standpoint, definitely not worth it. There's always diminishing returns beyond a certain performance level. Right now, the 7600 is probably the best bang-for-buck if you want a good gaming CPU. High-end never really was about good price/perf.

FidelityFX CAS is basically just a sharpening filter. You would probably get a bit more FPS while using CAS insted of DLAA, but we are only talking about a few percentage difference at most.

Actually, it's just Shadowplay, at a 100Mbps bitrate. Not even raw footage, since I'll always use Premiere Pro for some basic corrections.

4K?

you are getting the same fps at 1440p not 4k, at 4k you would not even get 60 plus

Yep, it was the first core that was active. Maybe it really wasn't the best choice, since my max clock speed was only 4875MHz, while it should boost up to 5050MHz, so I'll do some more testing with the other cores. Also, I'll definitely check out Returnal and some other games too, in the near future.

@@yezividalso see if you can limit power (to under 30W?) or how much limiting clock helps/hurts (maybe 2.5Ghz 4 core vs 5Ghz 2 core type of things, or maybe 3 core <5Ghz vs 5 core <3Ghz) from my X13 returnal video, it only needs 25W to get 60fps locked, and can do more with FG, so I think you can keep a 60fps lock (I would assume X3D should do better, but I have seen that the idle usage is higher because of the cache)

Going ultrawide was easily the best upgrade that I did, ever. It provides a much more immersive gaming experience than a standard 16:9 display. Ultrawide is awesome, can't recommend enough.

@@yezivid you cant go back after upgrading to ultrawide. I am playing since 2020 on ultrawide and there is no way I play on 16:9 ever again. Ultrawide is just to good.

I meeean, path tracing is a bit more than just “good looking lighting”. It’s expensive now, but eventually it will probably be a mainstream tech. But sure, don’t get me wrong, Helldivers 2s lighting looks pretty impressive even without RT/PT, tho it lacks a bit in other graphical standpoints.

CS2 runs at like 300-400FPS even on a Ryzen 5 5600, in my book it's an irrelevant game as a CPU benchmark.

@@yezivid still good to know on the test benchmarks,,,thanks for the reply!

Weird, could you possibly be CPU limited at 1440p? My GPU usage is around ~95-99%, and the lowest FPS I've seen was around 80 tho I'm not really paying attention to the overlay when I'm in intense fights. I'll do another benchmark run at other resolutions/maps, so far it looks like the missions against the machines are more resource-heavy.

Almost definitely cpu limited. The game does use a lot of cores well, but will still be limited by the most heavily loaded threads. So even if your overall cpu is usage is 68%, 1,2,3, or 4 cores may be hitting 90/100% limiting the overall frame rate.

turn off framerate limit in game and just leave vsync on. Whenever I have a frame limit in this game my cpu usage goes through the roof and my cpu temp goes from mids 60s to high 70s.

Around 4-5 second. (Plus sometimes another 3-4 seconds till it connects to the other speaker.)

Same here 5600x + 4080

I completely disagree. Everything is blurry when you downgrade.